Philosophy of Religion

websites  |  blogs  |  magazines photo galleries  |  my books  |   notes for students  |  home      

 

► Free notes?

► Photo galleries?

CLICK HERE

to see what else is on offer from this site.

 

Dave Webster, who runs the Religion, Philosophy and Ethics course at the

University of Gloucestershire, has a blog with an interesting range of entries and links.

Take a look at www.r-p-e.blogspot.com

 

There have recently been a whole range of books attacking the basis of religion, or presenting it as a natural phenomenon (on the assumption that most religious believers would not accept it as such). See, for example, God is not Great by Christopher Hitchins, Daniel Dennett's Breaking the Spell and The End of Faith by Sam Harris.

 

Click the USA link, where shown, to get a dollar price from  Amazon.com. If there is no direct link, please click on the box below and key in the book you are looking for.

 

 

Select resources by subject:

Ethics

Philosophy (General)

Philosophy of Religion

Philosophy of Science

Philosophy of Mind

Political Philosophy

Buddhism

 

 

 

Browsing Simon Blackburne's web pages, I came across this lucid introduction to Hume's approach to religion in his Dialogues... http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/~swb24/PAPERS/Humedial.htm

It reminded me of just how far some militant atheists today have to go before they can catch up with the best arguments of the 18th century!

Discussing matters of religion with two friends (one a senior Anglican clergyman, the other a retired Professor), it was commented that... 'To ask if God exists is to ask the wrong question.'

[Either answer to that question has to be wrong, if the question is taken literally. A god who 'exists' in a literal sense cannot be God. To deny any sense of god is to turn away from a whole world of religious experience and expression, touching the depths of human nature and our relationship with the universe. To affirm an existing god is to make the whole question superficial, and to create a god in our own image.]

Dealing with God

Discussion about what ‘God’ means, or whether God exists is clearly central to the Philosophy of Religion. Frustratingly, much recent debate (especially between religious and scientific fundamentalists) is superficial on the question of God. It is therefore refreshing to find a book which takes, almost as an obvious starting point, that God certainly does not ‘exist’ in the literal way that things in the universe exist, and therefore that – if we are going to appreciate the word ‘God’ and what it refers to – we need to probe something of its history. Karen Armstrong’s The Case for God is a particularly valuable book in that it provides a clear overview of the whole set of issues surrounding God. (Buy it now in the USA.)

But I have also found it useful to look at two books – one presenting the position of philosophers who do not accept belief in God (Philosophers without Gods, 2007) (Buy now in the USA.) and an answering volume Philosophers and God, 2009 (Buy now in the USA ). Apart from one or two rather sad lapses into polemic in the first of these volumes, both present what belief in God means with clarity and sensitivity.

We can set aside the crude, supernatural notion that God exists as an external object within (or beyond) the world – that would be idolatrous for a monotheist. But how does one square religious practice and language with the conviction that God is a human construct; an image used to probe the meaning of human life within the universe?  There is still a mismatch between what theologians and philosophers say and what popular religion appears to proclaim - and while that mismatch continues, religious beliefs of all sorts will be rightly vulnerable to the less-than-sensitive criticisms of a newly vocal but rather superficial form of atheism.

The challenge... and my personal view

In the introduction to his book A History of Modern Britain, 2007, Andrew Marr, political commentator and shrewd observer of the modern mores, comments on the experience of living in Britain since the Second World War:

‘In the period covered by this book, the dominant experience has been acceleration. We have lived faster. We have seen, heard, communicated, changed and travelled more. We have experienced a material profusion and perhaps a philosophical and religious emptiness that marks us off from earlier times.’ p. xxxi

If his comment is right – and I believe it is, minus the 'perhaps' – then there is no more important challenge today than to get to grips with the Philosophy of Religion. Philosophy should not be an obscure or exclusively academic subject. At its best, it is simply the willingness to think carefully about what it is we know and what it is we value. It is the process of bringing reason and evidence to bear on the assumptions of everyday life.

So the challenge of studying the Philosophy of Religion is to apply reason to religious beliefs and values, and to do so in a way that is rigorous (not being afraid to ask difficult questions) and also sensitive, recognising the key importance that religion has in the lives of very many people.

Sadly, there are plenty of religious people who do not seem willing or able to use their reason to examine what religion is about, preferring fundamentalist acceptance of dogma. Equally, there are a good number of really intelligent people (including top scientists and philosophers) who seem particularly obtuse when confronted with religious ideas, preferring to caricature and dismiss them, rather than examine why people choose to follow them.

Hopefully, a grounding in the Philosophy of Religion will be a useful antidote to both of these narrow views.

 

An apology for imbalance on the religion and science issue...  

Some books are readable yet utterly frustrating. God: the failed hypothesis by Victor Stenger wants to show that science has now advanced to a point at which it can show that God does not exist. Sadly, however good his science, Stenger's argument and logic is rather crude when it comes to philosophy and religious beliefs. In effect he has a 'no-gap-left-for-God' argument.  I'm rather torn, because I find myself in agreement with many of his conclusions, and yet frustrated by the glib and faulty logic or some of his arguments. Richard Dawkins proclaims on the cover that he 'learned an enormous amount' from the book, which is rather sad.

 Buy in the USA.

And while on the topic of Dawkins (whose work on science I find inspiring), here is a comment I posted for the Religion and Science page - as a warning to those tempted to assume that an eminent and articulate scientist will have a balanced and logical view on matters of religion...

'For those who, having admired his earlier work, are tempted to take Richard Dawkins' The God Delusion as a seriously argued work of philosophy or science, should read The Dawkins Delusion by Alister McGrath. This book, by a fellow Professor at Oxford who started his career as an atheist rather than a theologian and as a scientist, as a usefully negative function of showing just how far Dawkins has given up any pretence at serious argument in favour of re-cycling outdated atheist polemic. Although I was fearing an equally polemical theist tract, that was not the case. I found the book helpful, and a useful counterbalance to Dawkins.'

 

 

Those who are equally dissatisfied with militant atheism on one side and naive fundamentalism on the other would do well to read..

Science, Religion and the Meaning of Life by Mark Vernon.

Blending clear argument with personal reflections, it offers a defence of agnosticism, from one who has moved from belief in God, through atheism to a position of positively embracing a level of uncertainty.

'Encouraging us to widen our imagination and to open our lives to a sense of wonder, Mark Vernon is convinced, in the tradition of Socrates, that we achieve this by avoiding the certainties of faith and the rigidities of atheism. Believers and non-believers will find this a richly rewarding read.'  John Gladwin, Bishop of Chelmsford.

 

And if you enjoy this book, why not take a look at his website and blog:  www.philosophyoffriendship.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For an introduction to key arguments, see the latest edition of my 'Teach Yourself ' book Understand The Philosophy of Religion

click here for information

 

 

For students at A level, see my

Introduction to Philosophy and Ethics

 

 

click here for information

 

 

And for issues relating to Religion and Science, for students at A level, see

Religion and Science in the Access to Religion series

 

 

click here for information

 

For those wanting to do further work on religious experience, there's no better starting point than going to the classic texts themselves...

 

Otto The Idea of the Holy

►Schleiermacher Speeches on Religion

►James The Varieties of Religious Experience

 

 

 or buy in the usa

 

 

 or buy in the usa

 

 

or buy in the usa

 

 

 

 

 

 All material on this site is © Mel Thompson unless otherwise attributed